CityGirl

Cover up already Britney!

December 6, 2006 · 17 Comments

Normally, I wouldn’t do a post about the exploits of the empty headed, attention seeking, starlets who run wild in Hollywood.  What’s the point?  The main reason that the tabloids exist is to chronicle every dumb move that they make.  And who wants to read about clueless celebrities anyway?  Oh, I forgot.  Apparently everyone.

 

I couldn’t help thinking about the latest exploits of Britney Spears though, going around without knickers, flashing her couchie indiscriminately for the world to see.

 

Now I have no problem with a lass going without panties.  The Lord knows that I have been guilty of that on more than a few occasions.  Actually I’m happiest with less.  Less clothes that is.  I’ve always said I could live happily in a nudist colony.  I don’t really wear clothes at home and for years now, I’ve taken to sleeping sans knickers even if I’m wearing a top.

 

I must have known intuitively that it was good for the fanny because during a recent Tyra episode she had a gynaecologist (sp) come on and encourage women to sleep without panties.  Apparently our little honey pots need airing out time and the best time for that was during sleep.  Well, since I’ve been doing this for years, I felt vindicated, even though no one had levied any accusation.  Secretly I had felt it was quite degenerate of me (deliciously so!), but did it anyway. 

 

But I digress from the reason for this post.  Back to Miss Spears and her penchant for airing her supposed-to-be secret bits in public.

 

Back in the good ole days, whenever a Hollywood starlet wanted to show some skin, they’d call up the ever accommodating Hugh Hefner who was always happy to facilitate their desire for a spread (pun intended) in his infamous Playboy magazine.

 

Somehow that old-fashion way of publicly exposing oneself appeals to me more than what seems to be the current fashion.  It looks a bit more ‘tidy’.  The starlet gets her desire for public viewing of her private bits.  She’s paid for it and because it seems like a well-thought out, (not to mention lucrative) decision, her reputation remains fairly unsullied.

 

What’s with cheapening what supposed to be hidden treasure by flashing it around for all and sundry to see? 

 

Why deprived the men the (debatable) pleasure of purchasing a Playboy or Penthouse magazine in order to view the no longer private parts of the famous?

 

Think of the harm to the world’s economy.  Playboy/Penthouse stop selling because what normally was paid for is just a mouse click away.   Layoffs, redundancies everywhere as the Playboy/Penthouse magazines and their distributors everywhere (including in Jamaica) try to survive the new immorality order.

Categories: Bits and Bobs

17 responses so far ↓

  • Mad Bull // December 6, 2006 at 6:11 am

    There is plenty of porn out there but I don’t think Penthouse or Playboy is really dying off. They have just moved to the net too… They do have to work harder though, cuz the competition must be rough!
    I haven’t seen Britney yet, can you believe it? Oh well… I will survive.

  • katcampbell // December 6, 2006 at 11:51 am

    Brittany needs slapped. She’s a mother for goodness sake! Does she think her kids won’t someday see these pictures? With their luck saved for the next sixteen years and then blown up life sized and pasted on their lockers. Shame on Brittany.

  • Kingston Girl // December 6, 2006 at 3:25 pm

    Whoa, your imagination is running wild - one photo of Britney and you are predicting the end of the world economic system!

  • Gela Words // December 6, 2006 at 4:14 pm

    Hehe. Was in one of my wild, imaginative, silly moods. Teehee.

    I know Kat! What’s wrong with her anyway? Jeez.

  • Melody Piggy // December 6, 2006 at 5:44 pm

    The appetite for reality TV seems to overlap into the laps of Britney and Paris. If de exposure seems less orchestrated and more spontaneous, “reality junkies” gobble it up more. Anyway that kinda flash might soon be de in-ting — or it mighta been de in-ting already from Sharon’s scene-stealer in Basic Instinct.

  • Dr. D. // December 6, 2006 at 7:35 pm

    I have no interest in seeing Brtitney with or without clothes. Had she decided to spread her stuff in Penthouse, I wouldn’t waste my money to buy the issue.

    She really just is a overrated hyped up celebrity….well, perhaps in the eyes of some.

    Now, on to more interesting pplz Miss Gela….seems we share some habits…I too am one who loves little if any clothing…boxers are the rule at home….and au raw for sleep….nothing feels better!

  • Dr. D. // December 7, 2006 at 7:42 am

    Gela….seems somebody decided to come to your site and salt up tings….

  • kami // December 7, 2006 at 8:14 am

    Britney like she desperate fo r press. I guess any attention is good once it keeps people talking. better she than me

  • Kingston Girl // December 7, 2006 at 8:49 am

    gela - i got an annoymous comment like that on my old blogger site today - someone obviously has too much time on their hands!

  • bassChocolate // December 7, 2006 at 9:19 am

    Whoa… I really wasn’t expecting a ’save the industry’ punchline there, Gela :D

    You know what disturbs me? I saw the picture… there’s a reason people get glammed up before they do nude spreads- they have to get everything looking right. In that picture, everything looked wrong. Was not flattering at all…

    My eyes hurt now.

  • scratchie // December 7, 2006 at 3:36 pm

    Well i just adjusted my blog comments. Got that same comment on mine. Good thing the edit and delete function still work. :)

  • smartblkwoman // December 7, 2006 at 4:23 pm

    Britney knew what she was doing; it was all for attention.

    Who wears a skirt up to their vagina with no undies unless they want to get their goodies on the front page?

  • Leon // December 7, 2006 at 8:13 pm

    At one point I wanted to see it. Not so sure now. Hey, at least Hef still has that show on MTV. And Playboy has classy girls, girls that men dream about, not those common drunk college sluts.

  • Cool Destiny // December 9, 2006 at 12:39 pm

    Agree with smartblkwoman. They want their stuff to be seen.

    Bass Chocolate, I offer therapy sessions if you feel you need that after being exposed to such trauma.

    Gela, this is getting eerie now … how many other things do we have in common now? I hate clothes. As I get home from work, I can’t wait to take it all off and let it stay off till the next day. I mean, it’s the way God intended for us and I’m all for nekkid. … OK Dr. D. we have that in common too!

  • guyana-gyal // December 13, 2006 at 12:19 pm

    Ha, wait ’til you go to Brasil! They invented that thong thing under super short skirt.

  • experienceaurie // December 14, 2006 at 6:45 am

    i have to agree with Kami on this one for sure…It’s just sad that she has to go to this level to seek attention in the media these days. she’s still fairly young and you would think that she wouldn’t have to go to that level to get attention, but again….nothing suprises me now.

  • yannie // February 21, 2007 at 8:59 pm

    britney………… you are my idol since when i was a kid………..please change your attitude………..i like you when you are simple…….just like the time i saw you on tv…………you are the pop princess…………

Leave a Comment